New Paragraph

HAVE YOU EVER BEEN A COP?
January 15, 2022

But you think police officers are lazy and overpaid?

Then let me ask you this:


Have you ever attended an autopsy on an innocent little 4-year old boy that was pulled out of a pond on Easter Sunday?


Have you ever seen the remains of a university student that was raped, beaten and set on fire?


Have you ever attended the autopsy for a mother of 5 that was shot in the head then forced to sit in court for weeks on end to guard the smiling, self-righteous, millionaire husband that had her killed?


Have you ever given first aid to an officer that was shot, promised that he’d be okay and then died while you knelt at his side?


Have you ever seen the lifeless bodies of two murdered children who still clutched little bags of candy in their hands after they were stabbed to death?


Have you ever listened to the confession of a grandfather that had anally penetrated his 3 year old grandson?


Have you ever picked through the remains of a house fire to gather up the charred remnants of the victims?


Have you ever interviewed a young female officer that found her dead police partner after he was shot in the head?


Have you ever had to console a boy who just watched 2 men murder his aunt?


Have you ever searched ditches for body parts that were cut off of a female murder victim?


Have you ever investigated the rape and murder of a young girl and brutal attack on her mother?


Have you ever had to search a dumpster for the body of a toddler?


Have you ever laid on the cold ground all night while a maniac fired shots over your head?


Have you ever sat face to face in an interrogation room with a smiling teen psychopath that had butchered 3 people?

Have you ever comforted a close friend after he shot a killed an armed suspect?


Have you ever been punched, kicked, spit on and bled on, but still had to put on a happy face and finish your shift?


Have you ever interviewed a frightened 5 year old after an adult stranger grabbed her so hard he bruised her vagina?


Have you ever watched a father identify the body of his beautiful and successful university student daughter after she committed suicide?


Have you ever had a broken-hearted boy bury his face in your stomach and bawl his eyes out after his police officer father had been shot and killed?


Have you ever sat with a crying father as he debated whether to pull his police officer daughter off life support? Did you ever stop a car in a desolate area in the middle of the night - while alone, to find the driver was an escapee that had murdered 6 people?


Have you ever entered a home through a window all alone, to find an elderly man because neighbours were concerned, only to find him long deceased by suicide?


Have you ever had to crawl around a dark yard during the night looking for 2 teens that shot up their teacher’s house over a classroom issue?


Have you ever been face to face with a drunken career criminal as he screamed obscenities at you, claiming that he “pays your salary” when he reality he’s never had legal employment in his entire life?


Have you ever crawled around a burning and smoke-filled house with your partner, trying to locate a sleeping victim?


Have you ever entered a house to find and wrestle with a hiding gunman?


Have you ever rolled down a staircase with a naked psychiatric patient that had slashed himself up and was still armed with a butcher knife?


Have you ever been to a violent domestic quarrel on Christmas Eve and watched little kids crawling around a dirt floor as you took away their drunken parents?


Did you ever respond to a shooting where the gunman had long fled, but arrive at the very moment he returned with his rife?


Have you ever climbed inside a twisted vehicle to console an elderly man as firefighters worked to free his mangled legs from the dashboard?


Have you ever investigated a suicide where a man killed himself with a shotgun blast because he thought he was dying of cancer…but he really wasn’t?


Have you ever had to knock on the door of a house and deliver the horrendous news to a family that their young loved one would not be coming home…ever?


I didn’t think so, and I’m truly happy for you.


Well, I have done each and every one of those things, and lots more, and I never felt I was being overpaid for a moment while I did. Thankfully I safely made retirement after 36 years and although I would do it all again, it took away some pieces of me that I’ll never get back.


It also left me with horrendous memories that will haunt me forever.


Many police officers and other emergency responders across the land have done all of that and much, much more. Some paid with their physical and/or mental health, while others gave their lives. 


But do you know what? Every once in a while, one of those officers will make an honest mistake while truly trying their best. When he or she does, the armchair-quarterbacking, second-guessing, over-sight, isolation, investigations, rumor-mill, criticism and negativity – from those who should know better and many who don’t, will be boundless. But they will persevere, because that’s what they do on the street – take the crap, move on and try to stay strong, knowing that the good days will still outnumber the bad.


Please support them. They do it all for you.

Leadership involves risk, especially in policing

By Chris Lewis • March 28, 2026
Leadership is inundated with risk, every hour of every day, in all sectors. In policing, legislative authorities and established policy are the ever-present guideposts, but occasionally policy just doesn’t apply. At times someone has to just make a decision to do something, or not, or they will fail the public they serve and the personnel it is their duty to lead. If it goes bad, time to own up, do damage control, learn from it and move forward. It always frightened me when I saw some at the senior executive level in policing think that supervisors and managers operate in a pristine little bubble where nothing should ever go wrong. Then when it did because some supervisor tried their best to make something work for all the right reasons, they wanted to pigeon-hole the person that took the risk. There were times during my own career when executives were not encouraged to take any risk either. In fact, taking risk was career risk in itself. Despite the best of intentions, if it went bad, the one ‘responsible’ be forever labelled as having failed. Even if the gamble went well, the jaundiced eyes from above would still forever look at them as being a potential liability. It became the “Oh, him. He’s the one that...” At times the daily decision making of high-level commanders would be second-guessed by those in the executive suites – some of whom had never really commanded anything. My buddy retired Chief Wayne Frechette used to describe these folks as: “They’ve never been out after dark on company time.” I know this same concept was alive in many other police services. Some at executive levels actually did serve in operational roles at some point but they never took a risk. Somehow, they were fortunate to skate through difficult situations through sheer luck as opposed to good decision-making and never developed any scar tissue along the way. They didn’t learn from failure – they survived by luck. They also were viewed by weak executives above them as being golden because there was never a milli-second of negativity around them. They were Teflon. But those that worked under their “command” (for lack of a better word) had no respect for them. They simply watched them walk around with coffee in hand, never leaving the office or making a decision. It wasn’t leadership, but it did pave the way to stardom from on high, for some. True leaders do take risks at times. Many I worked with and for did it all and did it well. They did so in the best interests of those they served and those they led, because it wasn’t about themselves, but was done in the service of those that placed their trust in them. Policy simply doesn’t fit every situation. It is most often a guide that anticipates most circumstances that employees will face, particularly the more common (high-frequency) ones. But it cannot predict every possible scenario. When that happens in policing, it can occur in very unlikely situations (low-frequency) that are incredibly high-risk. Supervisors cannot say “Sorry folks, the book doesn’t cover this one” and run away crying. They also don’t have time to tell bad guys, “Hey big fella, sit tight. We need to take a pause here and get the whiteboard out so we can have a group-think about how to stop your murderous rampage.” I think that many pseudo-leaders – far too many, are afraid to make risky decisions out of fear that an error will jeopardize their career. Instead, they risk their careers by not making decisions. Or as I like to say: “their fear of career-risk, risks their careers.” This can be fatal in the policing world. When a police supervisor shirks their responsibilities or quivers, sucks their thumb, and prays for the situation to go away, thankfully constables will come forward and do their best to get their teammates through it. Sometimes that ends well and when the supervisor emerges from their fear-induced coma, they will more often than not take credit for the success. But when the situation goes to hell-in-a-handbasket – despite best efforts, the pseudo-leader will document the risk-taking employee and add another bullet-point to their list of things they’ve done to “hold people accountable.” The panel at their next promotional interview will likely hear the false rendition proudly told. I hear examples of this practise from serving police officers across North America on a much too frequent basis. True leaders develop a culture of trust among those they lead that their suggestions and feedback are encouraged and valued. Their confidence that the leader wants their input encourages them to constantly analyze situations and give thought to what policy says and the options available when policy says nothing. That is good for the employee’s development and may save the leader’s hind-end and the continuity of the team on occasion when an employee steps forward in a crisis. Having said that, there will clearly be situations where there isn’t time for the whiteboard, and a decision needs to be made by the responsible “leader.” When it doesn’t work out, the real leader will step forward and be accountable. But when it does go well, the true leader will allow the light to shine on the team they have the honour to lead. In my view, we’re not seeing enough of that in North American policing. We need more genuine leaders at all levels of law enforcement organizations. Developing and promoting real leaders that can manage risk effectively is a must. Anything less fails everyone.

Why Joint Forces Operations Are No Longer Optional

By Chris Lewis • March 26, 2026
They used to be simply a "nice to have."

Police investigating police: Is there another option?

By Chris Lewis • March 18, 2026
The March 17 th announcement by the Toronto Police Service (TPS) regarding the Ontario Provincial Police (OPP) investigation into allegations by an Ontario Justice that three TPS officers colluded and lied during a 2024 murder trial against a man that ran over and killed TPS Constable Jeffrey Northrup in 2021, has further inflamed the debate over who should investigate alleged police wrongdoing. This instance combined with the recent arrests and ongoing police investigation into several TPS officers for their alleged involvement with organized crime, has brought this discussion to a boiling point. I appreciate the public perceptions around this investigative model given that the average citizen doesn’t necessarily understand the professionalism and commitment of police investigative teams like the recent OPP Criminal Investigation Branch (CIB) group. I have all the confidence the world in that team, but I also personally know the ability and integrity of the OPP Detective Inspector in-charge. So, if these investigations aren’t carried out by police, who will do them? They do not fall under the mandate of the Ontario Special Investigations Unit (SIU), which by the way is largely comprised of former police criminal investigators and forensic identification experts, many of whom investigated homicides in police services. For SIU to assume a larger role, they would have to grow exponentially and expand their team of ‘former cops’. These cases generally do not fall under the purview of Ontario’s Inspectorate of Policing either. They would loosely fall under the oversight role of Ontario’s Law Enforcement Complaints Agency (LECA), who is responsible for receiving, managing and overseeing public complaints against police, but frankly they don’t have mandate or the horsepower to conduct complex criminal investigations. They oversee the “public complaints” that may lead to a criminal investigation, but the investigation would be the responsibility of a police service to conduct. An expansion of the LECA would require a tremendous amount of funding and human resources, most of whom would also be former police officers. Hiring and training civilians to conduct such investigations is an option, but largely an incomprehensible one. Police criminal investigators are trained officers that generally start out as uniformed officers responding to occurrences and investigating more routine and less serious crimes, i.e. minor assaults and property crimes. They build investigative expertise over time, including in interviewing and interrogation; gathering and securing physical evidence; legal processes like obtaining judicial authorizations; presenting evidence in court; and various investigative strategies. They learn how to work with special police units that provide specific investigative skills, and more. All of this doesn’t happen overnight, but over a period of years and with the tutelage of more experienced investigators along that journey. Trying to turn a group of young and well-educated civilians – no matter how intelligent and well-intended, into a team of elite investigators, would be a complete disaster and unfair to the public or to the officers being investigated. Over my many years as a member or as the Director of the OPP CIB, my colleagues and I investigated criminal allegations against cops from other agencies. Before the SIU was formed, we investigated officers from many Ontario police services – large and small, who had used deadly force. Many were cleared and a number were arrested and charged. We also investigated criminal allegations against police chiefs in Ontario. Again, several were appropriately cleared, and some were brought before the courts. Municipal, provincial and federal elected officials were similarly investigated and some charged. Our members also investigated police officers in other provinces, including high-ranking ones. I personally investigated two Royal Newfoundland Constabulary officers that were involved in an arrest that result in the death of a suspect. They were properly exonerated, but I would have charged them in a heartbeat if they had wrongfully killed than man. I arrested an OPP Sergeant for sexual assault. A CIB colleague investigated and arrested two different OPP officers for criminal offences. Both of those officers had been personal friends of mine and years later committed suicide. There are tons of similar examples that I can refer to over my career. All of these involved the oversight and legal analysis of a Crown Attorney, sometimes from another province. The interesting thing, and what most of the anti-police folks will never believe, is that in every single one of those investigations, the dialogue that I was involved in with other officers that I worked with or supervised, involved doing what was right. In other words, “If the allegation is substantiated, we will put the case together, arrest them and put them before the courts.” Not even once, did we think about or do anything that would give an officer a pass when they committed a criminal offence. Never. I have every confidence in the world that the vast majority of municipal and RCMP colleagues across Canada would operate under the same guiding principle. Has the occasional officer worked in conflict with that approach? Undoubtedly. Were some investigators not as committed or capable as they should be and perhaps did a poor investigation accidentally or deliberately? Quite likely so. But I truly believe those cases are the exception, not the rule in criminal investigations. Where I more often believe poor investigations or deliberate attempts to inappropriately give a colleague a break continues to occur, is in Police Act investigations, where policy or employee harassment wrongdoings are suspected. I like to think that the focus on that continues to improve, but not fast enough in some cases. Sadly, I know now that unbeknownst to me at the time, it happened under my watch. A focus for my next article. The public and police deserve the very best of investigators to ensure that bad cops are effectively put out of business and good officers are cleared. If there’s another effective option that would appease the doubting public – aside from using current officers from other agencies or creating a new and costly entity that would be staffed by former police officers, I’d like to hear it.