New Paragraph

Has society become desensitized to critical issues?: Lewis
June 24, 2023

Has society become desensitized to critical issues?Or have our priorities gone completely awry? Perhaps both?

For example, it is truly awful that five people lost their lives in the North Atlantic while riding in a private company’s unsafe submersible, having paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to tour the aquatic gravesite of the RMS Titanic. But it became international news fodder for days while taxpayers from several countries paid millions upon millions of dollars to try and rescue these folks who had knowingly put their own safety at risk.


Don’t get me wrong. Of course they had to search and try to save those lives. We always do and always will. We don’t abandon ill-prepared and -equipped hunters who get lost in the bush because of their economic class.



My point here is that we won’t spend money on critical issues, and we don’t give attention to the plight of those who aren’t living the lifestyles of the rich and famous. Would the entire international community respond en masse to a sinking boatload of Cuban immigrants? And would it top the media cycle for four straight days?


If we collectively put half the North American media and public focus and funding used during the Titan implosion on vulnerable people, crime prevention, homelessness and policing alone, we’d save many more lives than five.


What else was going on concurrently last week that received little leading news coverage, no public fury and a complete lack of tax dollar commitment to prevent a recurrence?

In North America alone, kids are being abused, going to school hungry, and being led down a path where drugs and crime will become their only option in life, each and every day. Unhoused people, and those affected by mental health issues and or addictions, are living on sidewalks or in encampments. Violent crime is increasing in both urban and rural areas. On average there is more than one mass shooting per day in the United States. Canada’s numbers are much less stark, but remain concerning.


Schools are attacked and kids killed or forever traumatized with regularity. Seventy-five people were shot in Chicago last weekend alone – 14 of them fatally. Hundreds of refugees drowned in the Mediterranean Sea last week as they fled their homelands for better lives. That tragedy received only an infinitesimal amount of media coverage in comparison to the deaths of the billionaire adventurers.


More cops have been murdered in Canada in the past year than in any other year in history. Almost daily a police officer is shot in the U.S. At the same time so many continue to call to “defund police” and therefore impact officer safety and put prevention and community safety programs at risk. Where is the broad public outcry and headline news? We hardly ever talk about those societal issues comparatively.


Then there’s never-ending, nauseating government waste; spending more public funds on issues in other countries than on our own social service agencies, homelessness and our veterans; the vilification of police – sometimes by elected officials, including pulling them from schools; getting soft on crime; scales of justice that almost always tips towards criminals – giving more rights to them than to their victims and to the police who are trying to prevent violence and victimization. I could go on.


In one 24-hour period last year I watched a police funeral for two fallen Edmonton Police heroes that were shot and killed. These fine young men represented the eighth and ninth murders of Canadian police officers in seven months. Just before their funeral service began, news from the U.S. emerged regarding another mass shooting at a school, with three children and three adults dead. The shooter there was quickly shot and killed by responding Nashville police. Shortly thereafter, a Sergeant in the Sûreté du Québeclost her life after being stabbed while arresting a suspect in Louisville, Que. She was the second female officer murdered in Canada since RCMP Constable Shaelyn Yang was killed in Burnaby B.C. in last October.


As CTV’s Public Safety Analyst, in years gone by, I would have received numerous calls for interviews from the network TV and radio stations regarding each of these horrific events. But I didn’t. I only received a few calls regarding the huge Edmonton funeral.


Please know I am not complaining about a lack of work. Not at all. But it is simply an indicator to me that things have changed dramatically in the nine years I’ve been on contract to Bell Media. The public is getting desensitized to real public safety and socio-economic issues and mainstream news reporting that is unbiased and verified.


Why? Have we as a society hardened ourselves to public acts of violence? Has there been so many mass shootings, suicides, fentanyl deaths, mental health crises and cops being killed for no other reason than their uniforms, that we don’t react with the same shock, awe and thirst to fix it? Do we now take those tragedies and horrendous issues impacting large segments of society for granted as being inevitable life events and the new norm?


God, I hope not, but once again, I’m not optimistic.

Chris Lewis served as Commissioner of the Ontario Provincial Police from 2010 until he retired in 2014. He can be seen regularly on CTV and CP24 giving his opinion as a public safety analyst.

By Chris Lewis September 16, 2025
We need leadership to bring us together 
By Chris Lewis September 8, 2025
There are always many rapidly changing dynamics
By Chris Lewis June 21, 2025
Image: new-manager-training.com Imagine this scenario if you will, getting the worst boss on earth – a person who is the total antithesis of leadership. Your new “Boss” replaces a leader that wasn’t always right and was getting too old to meet the mental and physical demands of the job, but at the same time treated all those around him with respect. He tried to select people for key positions based on their experience base and his confidence that they may not always agree but the individuals picked would be honest with him, other employees and the client base. He undoubtedly made mistakes here and there and did have some flaws but would readily admit to most of them. This boss comes back to the organization having committed a list of publicly confirmed misdeeds and illegal acts – many of which would have singularly been a good reason to not hire even the lowest level of employee, and justification for imprisonment for others. However, he was chosen for the top job despite all that baggage. Conversely, he brings not one redeeming quality to the top position. From day one, it’s obvious that the new Boss is truly a “boss” and not a “leader.” He has old personal scores to settle and wreaks revenge on many employees that he doesn’t like. Not because they were dishonest, incapable or lazy, but because he perceives that they didn’t want him to return or didn’t always agree with his philosophies and rash actions during past affiliations. This activity causes panic among all employees who know they have no choice but to get aboard his out-of-control train or perish beneath it. Then – without any deep evaluation or thought, he makes tremendous cuts to many organizational programs – leaving thousands without work and lacking any strategy to provide much needed services to a vast array of client groups. He viciously cuts through the organization like a chainsaw through softwood. Why? Because he can. Some of these decisions may have had some degree of validity following a proper assessment, while others not, but that analysis never occurred. Most previous positive relationships with partner agencies and the majority of client groups are immediately scuttled by the new boss. He publicly demeans and taunts longtime allies with irrational statements and outright falsehoods. Never in the many decades of history of the organization has such broad-ranging international indignation been felt, largely as a result of his childish behavior. Very few productive relationships remain and although some new ones are developed, they are only with organizations that are poorly considered by clients and upstanding industry players. His decisions continually fly in the face of the needs of the immense client group but more align with the personal business interests of only the Boss and his business associates – some of whom are either known despots or of questionable character. Company stocks continue to plummet as a result of his silliness. That also has a significant negative impact on the fiscal picture of partner organizations around the world. Anyone that respectfully expresses disagreement or suggests alternative decisions to the Boss, are sidelined or fired, then are ridiculed and until they become unemployable. Gas-lighting, exaggerations, denials, the passing of blame and blatant lies are his norm. He seldom speaks the truth about anyone or any situation. The sycophants he has positioned to assist in his destruction of the organization, publicly praise him for his leadership and courageous decision-making, when the majority of employees and clients know it is just flagrant butt-kissing on their part. He constantly seeks and demands praise, even for things he didn’t do, then sulks and whines when he doesn’t receive it. He falsely takes credit for the few good things that do happen but quickly passes blame when things that have his fingerprints all over them, go horribly wrong. His God-complex is resounding and worsens with each passing day. His public claims of success – before and since becoming the Boss, and assertions of being the “Greatest Boss in history”, fall flat with anyone that truly knows him. He aggressively takes advantage of anyone he can but then turns on them at the flip of a switch. No one is beyond being found at the pointy end of his meanness stick. When caught making an error, he’ll blame everyone on his “team” before accepting any criticism. In fact, he’d turn on his own children if he felt it would make him look brave or heroic, or if it would prevent him from public humiliation. He states his 24/7 lies over and over so often to make his base of lemming followers believe him, that he seemingly believes them to be factual himself. Even when he is confronted with witness testimony or audio/video of his brazen lies, he blames others for being out to get him. Being accountable when things go wrong and letting the light shine on others when they go well, is beyond his comprehension. (Can you spell “narcissistic”?) Although he doesn’t understand the business, he refuses to surround himself with people that do, given that he thinks he knows more than any of them and possibly more than anybody, anywhere, ever, since the dawn of time. Public statements he makes are often completely ridiculous and childish, causing all those around him to force plastic smiles, offer him undeserved praise and nod like pre-programmed bobbleheads. People and even affiliated organizations live in such fear of his thirst for retribution that they either cow-tow to his insanity or prepare for annihilation. He is an embarrassment internally and externally, on an international scale. No past executive has even been so blatantly self-centered, mean spirited and/or inept, nor have they ever had such a negative impact on the organization and its people. It may take decades to repair all the damage he has done. Thankfully, his employment contract is only for four years, so there may be some light at the end of the tunnel. Most of those within and those reliant on the organization, as well as friends, associates, allies internationally pray that this nightmare will end at that time. If it’s not too late, that is. Just a bad dream for some or a reality for millions of us?