New Paragraph

The 50th Anniversary of the Tactics and Rescue Unit (TRU)
October 10, 2025

Celebration held

Friday October 3rd, 2025, saw the kick-off of the weekend long celebration of the 50th Anniversary of the OPP TRU. An incredible group of volunteers led by retired OPP D/Sgt. Craig Bridgeman – himself an “inactive” member of the then Belleville TRU team, put together a wonderful reunion of active and inactive members from across the country. The event was held at Casino Rama.


I attended the event and was thrilled to see many old friends and at the same time sad that some long-time friends were not in attendance due to their passing over the years. Despite the great turnout, a large number of veterans did not attend for whatever reason, and most of the serving members were committed to operations in West and North East Regions on the weekend. While we prayed for their safety, we reminisced about the many dangerous calls we had attended – either as individual teams, or multiple team calls, and a few significant operations that involved every TRU member in the province.


It was great to see the majority of the members that were trained and became part of the original TRU in 1975 in attendance. All wonderful officers. The initial team was formed to assist in the OPP security efforts required at events in eastern Ontario, as part of the 1976 Montreal Olympics. Following that endeavor, five teams of five members each were formed and placed in London, North Bay, Thunder Bay, Perth and Downsview.


Unfortunately, the original TRU Coordinator, retired Inspector Andy Maksmchuk, who authored a book on TRU, entitled TRU (Tactics and Rescue Unit): The Last Resort in Policing, A Memoir, could not attend the Anniversary due to flight scheduling challenges. Andy could’ve easily provided details of the forming of TRU and its early years of operations.


Although I had the pleasure of speaking at the Saturday night banquet, as did current OPP Commissioner Tom Carrique, who proudly supports TRU and the other programs within Field Support Bureau. I didn’t have to time to sufficiently walk through time from my perspective as an active member and as the Bureau Commander that oversaw TRU, let alone try and fill in the gaps before my arrival. However, the following is a summary of the years I was part of the TRU program.


I attended my initial TRU training at Camp Borden in June 1981, following extensive physical and psychological testing in the Toronto area. Even though I was in reasonable physical condition when I arrived at Camp Borden, it was some of the toughest training I ever participated in. I left there at 155 lbs., my lowest weight since high school and for the decades since!


The instructors that put us through the mill, while running, climbing, crawling and hiking every arduous mile with us, taught us skills that I had never dreamed of acquiring. Not all of our group graduated, but those that did left with advanced proficiency with all the TRU weaponry, self-defense, various tactics and related skills including cover and concealment, rappelling and much more. Instructors there like the legendary Harry Bell, became Gods to me. I strived to be at least half as good as they were.


At that time there were six teams of six officers, stationed in London, Mount Forest, Barrie, Perth, North Bay and Thunder Bay. I was happy to transfer from my northern post to any of those locations but was glad to be assigned to the London team.


The London guys welcomed me with open arms. We largely became life-long friends, at the same time pulling together as a highly-skilled team of tactical officers. We had a challenging call the first week that I was in London, with a number of shots fired before and after our arrival on-scene and before we successfully arrested the gunman. I thought, “Man, this is going to be fun.”


We trained as a team 5 days of every month and were given an hour of every workday to run or work out as individuals. Every fall and spring, we travelled to Camp Borden and met the other five teams for three weeks. We jointly reviewed recent calls and lessons learned, did joint training and ran scenarios day and night. Those were great sessions – hard work and lots of camaraderie. Several senior TRU members from the other teams became heroes to me. Harry Bell, Wayne Pickett, Peter Hrycyshyn, Dave Douglas, Ed Sherwin, my own Team Leader Rick Deering and more. I wanted to be just like them when I grew up! They taught me all the skills I never thought I’d be capable of, as well as how to be a good team member. They also unknowingly taught me a lot about people and about leadership.


When not training or away on calls, we worked in two-man cars on day and afternoon shifts and backed up detachment officers wherever we could. But our main role was to be immediately available to respond to occurrences involving violence, anywhere within the then #2 District, or beyond. If a TRU call did emerge, at least we’d have two officers quickly on scene to help contain it, gather information and prepare for the arrival of the rest of the team. Detachment members loved it when we helped them with occurrences or took calls for them, but some were bitter that we were often away on training or operations. We still tried our best to be helpful when we were around and to have good relations with our fellow OPP members.


London was a busy team. Lots of barricaded person calls, hostage situations, high-risk search warrants with the OPP Drug Enforcement Teams, biker activity, witness protection ops, backing up our Canine Teams tracking bad guys, doing large crime scene searches, VIP protection and more. In 1984, providing security to both Pope John Paul II and Queen Elizabeth, at various locations in Ontario.


It was the best of times and the worst of times. The successful calls were a huge adrenaline rush and involved lots of back-slapping and high-fives. The occasional call didn’t go as well as we hoped when we couldn’t locate a suspect, or murder victims’ bodies were found (although it was our goal to find a body, it was still a sad event when we did); or lives were taken – bad guys, or occasionally a good guy. But we did it all as a team, collectively learned and moved forward. We celebrated the good times, supported one another in the tougher times – on duty and off, and learned from each other every day.


When I became Team Leader in 1985, I found myself “supervising” a great bunch of men. I knew all of their strengths, their weaknesses, their team relationships and their personal goals. I knew their families and they knew mine. They never required inspiration or motivation from me and seldom did they need a gentle kick in the ass. It was like a team of racehorses that couldn’t wait to hear the bell. If anything, I had to slow them down on occasion. But I knew every one of them would take a bullet for me as I would for them.


In 1986, the six teams were amalgamated into three teams of twelve, situated in London, Barrie and Belleville (now Odessa). It was long overdue. Six men responding to an armed man in a house or manhunt in the bush, was never enough. Sometimes we only had four or five members, depending on courses, court, vacation etc., and often, the District Commander of the day was not open to requesting the Mount Forest team to back us up. It was ridiculously dangerous, but we did what we could because that was our job. We would never leave the detachment officers on the ground without giving them all the help we could.


Interestingly and sadly, when we responded to two cop killers in a house in Woodstock in the fall of 1984, we had four TRU members and one spare officer who was fully trained and waiting for an opening on a team to be transferred to. He was a good man. We placed him in the spot we felt he would be least likely to get into a gun fight and unfortunately it turned out to be THE spot. Before it was over, two officers were shot, one fatally and a bad guy was shot and killed. It was a mess. A couple of days later we were told that the bullet that killed Constable Jack Ross was fired from a TRU machine gun. It was the darkest day in TRU history up till that point and perhaps ever.


The news destroyed our member and devastated us all. It damaged OPP colleagues’ confidence in TRU across the province. It was virtually impossible to explain all the details and intricacies to the world so they could better understand the situation we were faced with. But I will say that if I was faced with the same initial briefing details, radio traffic information, lighting, shadows and other circumstances that our member was faced with at the time he fired those shots, I probably would have done the exact same thing. Many things had gone seriously wrong before the gunfight began and then everything came together in a perfect storm, unfortunately.


So, the increase in team strength in 1986 was a welcome change. It did however leave much of northern Ontario without TRU and the OPP has struggled since to provide tactical officers to the north in a timely way.


In all the sixteen different jobs I had in in my 36-year career, I worked with some great people and made good friends. But TRU was undoubtedly the hardest job to leave. Walking away from not just colleagues but amazing friends was difficult for me. But in 1987, I transferred into the Investigations Division at General Headquarters in Toronto and I was gone.


If I got wind of any TRU call happening in the coming years, I’d I watch it like a hawk from afar, always worried about the guys. I certainly kept close contact with a few of the London boys that I had worked so closely with over the years. TRU continued to support uniformed and investigative personnel and save lives in the years to follow. Their equipment, training and tactics evolved so far above and beyond what I had known it was amazing. People like the late Wade Lacroix and Brian Deevy were a significant part of that progress, as were many others to come. Training changed, selection processes were enhanced and the firearms and equipment improved greatly with time. TRU got better and better at doing what they already did so well.


In late 1997, I was promoted to Superintendent and placed in-charge of a brand-new OPP Bureau that would eventually be called Emergency Management Bureau (EMB). EMB was to oversee the TRU, ERT, Incident Command, Crisis Negotiation, USRU and EDU programs, as well as Emergency Planning, but not the team members themselves. We were Like Generals without an army. All the teams, sections and units’ members would report to the Regions and some to the OPP Academy.


I brought Brian Deevy in from Barrie TRU as an Inspector to oversee all of TRU as well as the Incident Command program. He oversaw full reviews into both programs. When I picked Brian for the job, I received accusations of just bringing in my “buddy.” When I asked the whiners to “name someone with more experience and credibility in TRU”, the whining ended. Before it was over our capable team reviewed and renewed every program to some extent..


When all the various reviews were complete, Commissioner’s Committee approved several important recommendations, one being that the three TRU teams would all become “provincial assets” rather than be part of three individual regions. Some Regions had historically treated TRU better than others, and in some cases training, staffing, budget and equipment issues fell to the whim of command staff, some of whom had other priorities to fund. Some teams had equipment that others didn’t, etc. We lacked consistency in several areas across the teams, so we recommended that everything be moved under EMB, with strong links to the OPP Academy for training coordination and record keeping purposes. All our recommendations were approved, substantial changes were made in many sections and for the decades that followed and the foreseeable future, TRU will belong to what is now Field Support Bureau. They have been effectively managed and supported by successive Bureau Commanders since. Their current Commander, Chief Superintendent Dana Earley, spoke at the banquet and very capably commands the FSB.


To all that attended the Anniversary and those that served but couldn’t attend; to all the serving members that were committed to ongoing TRU operations that weekend; and to the many TRU members that left us way too soon, thank you. Thank you for serving the OPP and thank you for working hard to become a member of TRU.


Thank you for bravely saving lives, for protecting our frontline members and investigators. Thank you for all you gave and continue to give – physically and emotionally. Thank you to those that supported and taught me in so many ways since 1981 – at all levels, including right up until I was Commissioner. I’ve never stopped learning from you and you continue to make me proud.


And lastly, never forget that there are no ex-members of TRU. TRU is comprised of ACTIVE and INACTIVE members, but they are all “members of TRU.” I am proudly an Inactive member for life.

 

 

By Chris Lewis February 13, 2026
I say "No."
By Chris Lewis February 11, 2026
Policing depends on public trust. So does police oversight. When either loses credibility, both suffer and the public they are sworn to serve isn’t sure who to believe or where to turn. In recent years, calls for stronger police oversight have grown louder, often driven by a small number of high-profile misconduct cases. Confidence in institutions by the public – often fueled by ridiculous social media theories and damnations, is more fragile than in the past, and reputational damage spreads faster. Despite the fact that Canadian police officers operate under tight legislative and regulatory frameworks that exceed any other Canadian profession in my view, existing oversight bodies feel pressure to take action quickly when bad things happen, as isolated as they may be. But there is a risk in this moment that deserves equal attention: the risk of overreach. The seven officers who have been alleged to have committed crimes – including serious ones that involve organized crime, must not be allowed to redefine an entire profession. Public trust certainly adds urgency to this moment. When corruption cases like this surface, the public does not necessarily see them as isolated failures. They see a system that is broken and in my view in this instance they see that unfairly. Policing is unlike most professions. There are over 70,000 police officers in Canada, comprised of federal, provincial and municipal officers that work under the worst of circumstances at times and face the harshest of critics. As a result of the arrests of seven serving Toronto Police Service (TPS) officers as well as a retired officer, then the subsequent suspension of two additional TPS officers and two Peel Regional Police Service officers, a large portion of the Canadian public are focusing on the ‘bad’ and forgetting the wonderful and brave police work occurring in their communities 24/7. Officers exercise coercive authority on the public on behalf of the public, often in volatile environments. They have right to take away people’s liberty and in the worst of situations to take lives. That authority most definitely demands the greatest of accountability, but it also demands reasonable, sensible and balanced oversight. Oversight systems designed around ‘worst-case scenarios’ risk governing by exception rather than thoughtful considerations and reality. One of the most overlooked consequences of overly broad oversight is its impact on ethical officers. When serious misconduct is identified, entire services face scrutiny and as a result of the Inspector General of Policing’s announcement to inspect all 45 police services in Ontario, the impacts are far reaching and not isolated to the police service of the members in question. The risk is that the resulting collective stigma will not only damage public trust but will also hurt officer morale; officer initiative may decline; recruiting could be impacted; and the reputation of the entire profession across Ontario will be damaged because of the alleged actions of a few. Oversight that blurs critical lines risks judging officers by association rather than their individual conduct. Officer trust in the oversight system and public trust in the policing profession could both be further harmed. As a result, both the Toronto Police Association and the Police Association of Ontario have rightfully expressed their concern regarding the inspection of all of Ontario’s police services. Their distress is that the announcement may be read by many that police corruption is rife across the province. At this point we do not know how much of this alleged criminal activity occurred off duty, versus on. We don’t know all the details of what they may have done and how, let alone what processes, policies or systems within the TPS that may have to be examined by the Inspector General. He may well have identified them all, but perhaps not. As the investigation portion by police continues, more things for inspection may be identified. In the meantime, I have no doubt that Ontario’s police Chiefs are reviewing their processes based on what they know so far, to ensure their policies, systems and internal oversight mechanisms are as tight as they can reasonably be. The seven charged officers are suspended and before the courts. The justice system is entrusted with dealing with these allegations from here. Others not charged but under investigation are suspended as well. There was no rush to begin a review process as this unfolds. Announcing that it will occur when the criminal investigation is complete and when they are armed with a more fulsome understanding of the issues that should be examined, would have been more appropriate. None of this lessens the need for accountability. It argues for thoughtful processes, analysis and reporting. Misconduct should be addressed decisively and dealt with through due process as it is, but broad oversight driven by isolated wrongdoings risks weakening the institutions we all depend on. Public trust matters. Undoubtedly. But so does institutional trust in police officers. In my view, processes that signal broad-based suspicion undermine the trust they are meant to protect. Oversight works best when it is firm, fair, and controlled.
By Chris Lewis February 7, 2026
Thursday’s announcement of the arrest of seven serving and one retired Toronto police officers for corruption, was a dark moment for policing in Canada and for the communities that trust their police to always do what is honest and right. At times like this it is too easy for us all to lose trust in those in which we should hold the highest level of trust in society, because of the actions of a few. I believe that we must remind ourselves about all that is good in policing in Canada – where training, standards, equipment, professionalism, governance and competence are second to none in the world. I view this as both bad news and good news stories. The bad news is that seven officers allegedly broke their oaths and committed heinous crimes. Startling, sad and completely unacceptable for the profession and more importantly for the public they were sworn to serve. The “good” news (although I struggle with the word) is that the system worked. Suspicions arose about a certain Toronto Police (TPS) officer’s potential involvement in a crime in York Region. Police there notified the Chief of the TPS, and they quickly agreed that York Regional Police (YRP) would lead the investigation, and TPS would remain in a support role by providing Professional Standards investigators and other assistance as required. I assume that would mean investigative support personnel and access to internal information about the TPS officers in question, like their schedules; what police cars they were driving; assignments and personnel file information, at minimum. By design, the TPS Chief did not have decision-making authority in the investigation. None of that raises any red flags for me. This was a large and complex investigation that eventually involved 400 officers and would require highly experienced investigators and specialty personnel. YRP and TPS have all of that and more. The leaders that addressed the media spoke competently and professionally, leaving no doubt that they would leave no stone unturned. Evidence was gathered and arrests of officers and others were made. The public was then appropriately advised of as many details as we have ever seen released in a media conference when charges were before the courts and an investigation ongoing. TPS Chief Demkiw announced he was seeking to suspend at least some of the officers without pay. That is something that has only recently became acceptable under Ontario’s policing regulations and must be used judiciously. Of course, social media “experts” and anti-police pundits took over from there. Please allow me to offer answers to some of the most consistent queries: Why wasn’t an independent oversight body like the Special Investigations Unit (SIU) brought on to investigate? Police shouldn’t investigate police! It’s not the legislated mandate of the SIU to conduct criminal investigations into police except in specific circumstances around police use of force or sexual assault. Nor is it the mandate of Ontario’s Inspectorate of Policing. These governing bodies do not possess the expertise or resources to conduct massive criminal investigations into officers and organized crime groups. Only large police services have the critical mass and knowledge to manage such difficult operations. An option for Chief Demkiw was to let his Professional Standards personnel be the liaison for TPS information and potential Police Act charges against TPS personnel that might emerge but leave the investigative support/assistance piece to another large outside service. That would’ve helped suppress any concern around TPS investigating their own. But police services often conduct criminal investigations into their own people with regularity in Ontario, unless they involve senior officers. There’s no hard and fast rule or Ministry guidelines on the issue to my knowledge. The Toronto Chief should step down. This happened under his watch. I cannot speak to his day-to-day job performance, but in my view, Chief Demkiw did not handle this case wrongly. The alleged illegal actions of 0.12% of his police personnel do not justify his removal. If he knew and didn’t take action that would be different but there is no suggestion of him doing anything but throwing his full support behind the YRP investigation. Again, perhaps he should’ve kept TPS out of it as much as possible, but that was a judgement call made in the early stages of an investigation that grew very large over time. All cops are corrupt. Why didn’t other officers stop them? What? This was seven officers in a police service of almost 6000 TPS officers and out of over 70,000 police officers in Canada. It is awful, without a doubt and concerning to say the least, but this does not mean there is a wave of police corruption and ties to organized crime across the nation. As this criminality unfolded and as we speak, thousands of officers are on the streets of Canada, saving lives and risking their own; patrolling communities; preventing crime and victimization; responding to life and death situations; arresting evil criminals and more. They do that professionally, bravely and honestly, or they are held to account under various laws and disciplinary processes. They are governed and regulated more than any other profession in Canada. Yes, some cops (even one is too many) out of those 70,000, commit crimes in their careers, which is unacceptable. Some of that occurs while they are on duty, some not. It is disappointing when it happens, but with rare exception police leaders will not accept it and will deal with it expeditiously through due process. In cases where a police supervisor or executive doesn’t take proper action, they will be held to account as well. As a rule, no one hates dirty cops more than honest cops. They hurt the profession as a whole across the continent. Canadian officers take a reputational hit regardless of where the wrongdoing occurs in North America. We don’t know the details yet of what these accused officers were doing or how much of it they were doing on the job, versus off duty. IF evidence comes to light in the ongoing investigation that colleague officers knew or participated in any way in the criminality, they will be in trouble as well. Let’s not jump to conclusions that other officers “must have known” and let the investigation run its course. Why do officers not have more oversight on the use of police databases? Police officers and a number of civilian colleagues have access to the Ministry of Transportation (MTO) database that holds all licenced driver and vehicle registration information in Ontario. Most police cars have computers in them that can access that information, which includes driver’s and owners’ addresses. It is accessed non-stop, 24/7, as a regular part of core police business. Other databases involving outstanding warrants and criminal history, as well as occurrence records are similarly accessed. Government employees that work at MTO or in some other Ministries have like access to people’s names and addresses. That is reality in all 10 provinces. We cannot limit legitimate government employee access to vital systems on the off chance they may be inappropriately used. That includes those that we entrust to carry guns and make life and death decisions. When such databases are misused in some way, proper action must be taken promptly, as it was in this case, as opposed to hamstringing the operability of several hundred thousand honest employees across Canada. Canadian police officers are internationally highly-regarded, but they are human, have frailties and will honestly err on occasion while truly trying to do their best. That can be dealt with and repaired when it occurs. But when officers commit acts of malice, they will be appropriately held accountable and dealt with through due process. That is the bedrock of Canadian policing. Public trust in police is paramount to effective policing, and largely we enjoy that in our country. We cannot let this dark day define what policing actually is in Toronto or anywhere in Canada. Canadians should move forward with confidence that the system did work in this case. Those that violated our trust are before the courts. The vast, vast majority of officers that are still out there bravely doing what they do so well, will never let us down. Please give them a chance.